http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Aedra_and_Daedra

"Aedra are associated with stasis. Daedra represent change.
Aedra created the mortal world and are bound to the Earth Bones. Daedra, who cannot create, have the power to change.
As part of the divine contract of creation, the Aedra can be killed. Witness Lorkhan and the moons.
The protean Daedra, for whom the rules do not apply, can only be banished."

Seriously it sounds like none of you peeps read the books in game I suggest this site over a crappy beth troll fest. The site i will be posting is for true lore fanatics.

http://www.imperial-library.info/ Trust me its a way better place for researching TES Lore I mean would you rather talk to Scholars of the lore or fanboys on a beth forum.

http://forums.bethsoft.com/forum/16-elder-scrolls-lore/

Sure, post a link here and I shall add my input.

A fan challenging developers' lore, that's bold. Let's bring it to the official forum, modding page is not the place.

I did worry that someone would say this. But after some thought I think that Dragons, being the children of Akatosh ought to be stronger than your average Deadra and thus products of such creatures ought to be more powerful. Also Daedra are much easier to kill than Dragons which leads me to think that, if one encounters Daedra at the same rate as Dragons one would find it easier to get the armour. In this case I think the lore is wrong and needs to be reimagined. Therefore I call this a Fix at both game and lore level.

Please remove dragon>daedric, it's lore breaking, not a fix. I respect the fact that some may like such mods, just do not call it a fix!

Thank you Rusty Shacklefurd-[Box]. Remeber to check the comments in each collection so that you don't miss any announcements about bug-fixes and additions to each collection.

This is the second collection of yours I've subsribed to and I just wanted to say that of all the collections I think you've done a fantastic job of not only keeping the mods organized by category but also for improvement and absolute usefullness. Great Job!