Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
It's well made, for sure, but I personally just don't see this working stylistically in TF2.
I understand it's a very popular contribution but really, I don't see it fitting. I also know that Frozen Aurora is in the game, and I really don't think it should be, but yeah.
Well made, but not for me.
IT'S SPACE AND I LOVE SPACE!!!!
and even more with the combination of blue and purple
good job
I also appreciate your honesty. Honestly, IMO, it should be a standard to show the different wears on the Workshop page, but I don't work at Valve and we pretty much know for the majority of war paints the lower wears are just going to look worse, so... eh. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The reason, however, I ask war paint creators to show off the different wears is because of two reasons: 1) They'll make up 4/5 of the possible skins floating around in circulation, and 2) While they usually do look worse, it's varying degrees of just how bad it actually is. For example, the Damascus & Mahogany, Kill Covered, Hazard Warning, and Bamboo Brushed skins look semi-decent at lower wears, but Croc Dusted and Quack Canvassed are absolutely atrocious at Field-Tested and below (This is all my opinion, plz don't crucify me).