Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's well made, for sure, but I personally just don't see this working stylistically in TF2.
I understand it's a very popular contribution but really, I don't see it fitting. I also know that Frozen Aurora is in the game, and I really don't think it should be, but yeah.
Well made, but not for me.
IT'S SPACE AND I LOVE SPACE!!!!
and even more with the combination of blue and purple
good job
I also appreciate your honesty. Honestly, IMO, it should be a standard to show the different wears on the Workshop page, but I don't work at Valve and we pretty much know for the majority of war paints the lower wears are just going to look worse, so... eh. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The reason, however, I ask war paint creators to show off the different wears is because of two reasons: 1) They'll make up 4/5 of the possible skins floating around in circulation, and 2) While they usually do look worse, it's varying degrees of just how bad it actually is. For example, the Damascus & Mahogany, Kill Covered, Hazard Warning, and Bamboo Brushed skins look semi-decent at lower wears, but Croc Dusted and Quack Canvassed are absolutely atrocious at Field-Tested and below (This is all my opinion, plz don't crucify me).