Yes, I referred to Network ScotEast as needing the overhead wires available exclusively at ATS. WCMLS v5.3 does not.

The WCML Trent valleys wire are used in the WCML south v5.3 .

1. You don't have to start with "Dear Cyclone". This is informal chat. Unless there are multiple replies and you need to spell out who you are replying to, just spit out whatever you want to say.

2. I've seen that! I still have to do my ATS route downloads, one of the last things I'm doing before I start playing a lot more. Once I finish that and more snailing UKTS downloading, I'll be going through all my default DLC, but I will have the routes and be trying to keep an eye out for updates to them and scenarios for them. WCML South v5.3 is on my download agenda too, and Network ScotEast as well (though I do not have the overhead wires yet, I'm trying to time subscribing for getting the final version of the subscription routes).

Dear Cyclone, I have made a backdated Isle of Wight which is available on ATS. Here is the link to the route Website link [alanthomsonsim.com].

I'm not a reskinner, myself. But I am sure there are people at ATS who might be able to help.

Dear Cyclone, Can please make a reskin of the British Rail Class 323 into a GWR livery? The reason why I am asking is because I am not very good at making reskins of trains in train simulator.

I still don't think you understand what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about making a patch. I'm talking about THIS as a patch for the already final route. But again, it seems the original route maker isn't interested in that, so it's not an issue.

Dear Cyclone, when I make this route final you can then make a patch for it. The reason why I am saying final is because I make brake the patch and so by making it so that it will not change the patch should not brake.

Not what I meant. But yeah, I know he's OK with it, I had to look around the comments. Both myself and someone else thought something was up until I did that.

The reason behind creating a patch would be to NOT have confusion over the different routes. If existing scenarios work on your version - something I may have to test - when creating a patch for his route would mean people can just run an installer that is provided and be able to get the updates even though his route is final. The existing scenarios would then still work on his route. But it sounds like he doesn't want to figure that out, so that's fine.

Dear Cyclone. The Joethefish is ok with me doing it a different route and if a patch was made it may make some people confused with the different routes. As Joesthefish is ok with it as it is so why changed it?

I have withdrawn my prior comment. I see that you in fact had asked permission. My apologies. Even so, I would suggest giving the improvements to him and having him update the route after testing scenarios work. He can create a patch to update the route and give you credit. That way, everything stays together instead of having multiple versions. Cheers.