Train Simulator Classic 2024

Train Simulator Classic 2024

Not enough ratings
London to Brighton: Flooded!
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite

Subscribe to download
London to Brighton: Flooded!

Description
It's the summer of 2017. Again, huge floods have hit the UK, but a bit further down the Thames, this time. In London, in fact!Despite the London Victoria terminus being underwater, Southern services are still struggling on. Passengers are being advised to wear wellies and suit up before boarding the 15:37 to Redhill.This is still a work in progress, I will work more on this later. But what is this? It's London to Brighton... Flooded!
49 Comments
Sprinter15x 7 Jan, 2018 @ 9:14am 
It's certainly different and fun to drive :steamhappy:
Legdig 20 Aug, 2016 @ 4:35pm 
I hope its not too much to ask, but could we get a version of this for quickdrives please?
roadierunway12  [author] 9 Nov, 2014 @ 8:14am 
There are little olive-coloured triangles at the edge of the water which allows you to expand the water, but it can only be expanded to a certain size (goodness knows why). For a large area you'll need several of the water assets.
roadierunway12  [author] 9 Nov, 2014 @ 7:38am 
Hey Miles,
To flood, I simply used the 'Water Reflective' asset and put it over the route to cover some things in water. It's pretty simple.
If it's not appearing in scenarios or in the route builder after you've placed it, then double -click it and set the detail level to 10. The update for TS15 made all assets with low detail level go invisible in scenarios.
Hope this helps.
[unassigned] 17 Oct, 2014 @ 3:52pm 
Ya no, if it rally was flooded like this, these trains won't even run. But Ah get it. (It's a mostly boring game to most people) Got 2 put some excitement in it.
roadierunway12  [author] 4 Oct, 2014 @ 11:19am 
@FelixTrain
Yes, of course you're allowed. I might need to make the route final first, but go ahead for the moment.
TheTrain 29 Sep, 2014 @ 2:29pm 
Would I be allowed to use this route to make a scenario for the steam workshop?
roadierunway12  [author] 29 May, 2014 @ 8:10am 
@koasterkidd,
Steam locos wouldn't be able to run either because the water may get above the fire height and put it out.
So basically no trains would be able to run in a flood...
But this route has to have trains. So 3rd Rail or whatever, I'm keeping the 377's because it looks very strange and comical.
JC_02 28 May, 2014 @ 3:59pm 
looks really fun and exiting
postchadcore 17 May, 2014 @ 12:50pm 
Major flaw in the route... No 3rd-Rail (or diesel locomotives, for that matter) would be even able to operate if this were a real flood. The only locomotives that would be even close to eligibility for operation would be steam locomotives. "A" for effort, "D" for rationality