Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I didnt like the lack of antines though.
And I stand by what I said: the most talented maps designers don't need to resort to this approach to make their puzzles challenging. In fact, some of the most challenging tests have no elements at all: Momentum by Mevious is a great example of such a test.
The idea that I can't produce a valid critique of a puzzle because I " obviously don't know enough about making tests" makes as much sense as telling someone they can't tell healthy teeth from bad teeth because they're not a dentist.
I suggest you study the map from the masters (Mevious, Ben77, Azorae, Tmast98, LoneWolf and others) and learn from them. The cube cleaning thing was original however... just not very elegant.